9. E. Alberdi et al. Why Are People’s Decisions Sometimes Worse with Computer Support? // Proceedings of SAFECOMP 2009, the 28th International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security / Eds. Bettina Buth et al. Hamburg, Germany: Springer, 2009. Р. 18–31.
10. См.: Raja Parasuraman et al. Performance Consequences of Automation-Induced Complacency // International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 1993, № 1. Р. 1–23.
11. Raja Parasuraman and Dietrich H. Manzey. Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration // Human Factors 52, 2010. June. № 3. Р. 381–410.
12. Norman J. Slamecka and Peter Graf. The Generation Effect: Delineation of a Phenomenon // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 4, 1978. № 6. Р. 592–604.
13. Jeffrey D. Karpicke and Janell R. Blunt. Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping // Science 331, 2011. Р. 772–775.
14. Britte Haugan Cheng. Generation in the Knowledge Integration Classroom // PhD thesis, University of California, Berkeley, 2008.
15. Simon Farrell and Stephan Lewandowsky. A Connectionist Model of Complacency and Adaptive Recovery under Automation // Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 26, 2000. № 2. Р. 395–410.
16. Я уже обсуждал работу ван Нимвегена в моей книге: The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. N. Y.: W. W. Norton, 2010, Р. 214–216.
17. Christof van Nimwegen. The Paradox of the Guided User: Assistance Can Be Counter-effective // SIKS Dissertation Series No. 2008–09. Utrecht University, 2008. March 31. См. Также: Christof van Nimwegen and Herre van Oostendorp. The Questionable Impact of an Assisting Interface on Performance in Transfer Situations // International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39. 2009. May. № 3. Р. 501–508; Daniel Burgos and Christof van Nimwegen. Games-Based Learning, Destination Feedback and Adaptation: A Case Study of an Educational Planning Simulation. В книге: Games-Based Learning Advancements for Multi-Sensory Human Computer Interfaces: Techniques and Effective Practices / Eds. Thomas Connolly et al. Hershey, Penn.: IGI Global, 2009. Р. 119–130.
18. Carlin Dowling et al. Audit Support System Design and the Declarative Knowledge of Long-Term Users // Journal of Emerging Technologies in Accounting 5, 2008. № 1. December. Р. 99–108.
19. См.: Richard G. Brody et al. The Effect of a Computerized Decision Aid on the Development of Knowledge // Journal of Business and Psychology 18, 2003. № 2. Р. 157–174; Holli McCall et al. Use of Knowledge Management Systems and the Impact on the Acquisition of Explicit Knowledge // Journal of Information Systems 22, 2008. № 2. Р. 77–101.
20. Amar Bhidе. The Judgment Deficit // Harvard Business Review 88, 2010. September. № 9. Р. 44–53.
21. Gordon Baxter and John Cartlidge. Flying by the Seat of Their Pants: What Can High Frequency Trading Learn from Aviation? В книге: ATACCS-2013: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control Systems / Eds. G. Brat et al. N. Y.: ACM, 2013. Р. 64–73.
22. Vivek Haldar. Sharp Tools, Dull Minds. (This Is the Blog of Vivek Haldar). 2013. November 10. UPL: http://www. blog.vivekhaldar.com/post/66660163006/ sharp-tools-dull-minds.
23. Tim Adams. Google and the Future of Search: Amit Singhal and the Knowledge Graph // Observer, 2013. January 19.
24. Betsy Sparrow et al. Google Effects on Memory: Cognitive Consequences of Having Information at Our Fingertips // Science 333. 2011. № 6043. August 5. Р. 776–778. В другом исследовании было показано, что одно только знание о том, что некое событие запечатлено на камеру, ослабляет память, с ним связанную. Linda A. Henkel. Pointand– Shoot Memories: The Influence of Taking Photos on Memory for a Museum Tour // Psychological Science, 2013. December 5. UPL: http://www. pss.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/12/04/0956797613504438.full.
25. Mihai Nadin. Information and Semiotic Processes: The Semiotics of Computation // Cybernetics and Human Knowing 18, 2011. № 1–2. Р. 153–175.
26. Gary Marcus. Guitar Zero: The New Musician and the Science of Learning. N. Y.: Penguin, 2012. Р. 52.
27. Подробное описание механизма обучения мозга чтению см.: Maryanne Wolf. Proust and the Squid: The Story and Science of the Reading Brain. N. Y.: HarperCollins, 2007. Р. 108–133.
28. Hubert L. Dreyfus. Intelligence without Representation – Merleau-Ponty’s Critique of Mental Representation // Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1. 2002. Р. 367–383.
29. Marcus. Guitar Zero. Р. 103.
30. David Z. Hambrick and Elizabeth J. Meinz. Limits on the Predictive Power of Domain-Specific Experience and Knowledge in Skilled Performance // Current Directions in Psychological Science 20, 2011. № 5. Р. 275–279.
31. K. Anders Ericsson et al. The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance // Psychological Review 100, 1993. № 3. Р. 363–406.
32. Nigel Warburton. Robert Talisse on Pragmatism // Five Books, 2013. September 18. UPL: http://www. fivebooks.com/interviews/robert-talisse-on-pragmatism.
33. Jeanne Nakamura and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. The Concept of Flow. В книге: Handbook of Positive Psychology / Eds. C. R. Snyder and Shane J. Lopez. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, 2002. Р. 90–91.
Интерлюдия. Танцующие мыши
1. Robert M. Yerkes. The Dancing Mouse: A Study in Animal Behavior. N. Y.: Macmillan, 1907. vii – viii. Р. 2–3.
2. Там же. vii.
3. Robert M. Yerkes and John D. Dodson. The Relation of Strength of Stimulus to Rapidity of Habit-Formation // Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology 18. 1908. Р. 459–482.
4. Там же.
5. Mark S. Young and Neville A. Stanton. Attention and Automation: New Perspectives on Mental Overload and Performance // Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3, 2002. № 2. Р. 178–194.
6. Mark W. Scerbo. Adaptive Automation. В книге: Neuroergonomics: The Brain at Work / Eds. Raja Parasuraman and Matthew Rizzo. N. Y.: Oxford University Press, 2007. Р. 239–252.
Глава пятая. Офисный компьютер
1. RAND Study Says Computerizing Medical Records Could Save $81 Billion Annually and Improve the Quality of Medical Care // RAND Corporation press release. 2005. September 14.
2. Richard Hillestad et al. Can Electronic Medical Record Systems Transform Health Care? Potential Health Benefits, Savings, and Costs // Health Affairs 24, 2005. № 5. Р. 1103–1117.
